Conforge Logo

Solutions · Visual Industrial Intelligence

Field Service Intelligence

The visual industrial intelligence and asset reliability system built for high-pressure industrial equipment. Failure diagnostics, root cause analysis, and operational knowledge, all in one place.

See a real failure diagnosed, from photo to corrective action, in under two minutes. No sign-up required to watch it work.

Field Service · Overview · This week
24

Total issues

6

Critical

3

Open investigations

15

Resolved

Executive Summary: Heat exchanger fouling drives the week, with corrosion-related tube leaks and two rotating equipment vibration flags, concentrated in the Cooling and Compression units. AI Insights: Flags an accelerating fouling rate against last month's baseline, links two leaks to the same exchanger bank, and surfaces a vibration signature matching a prior bearing failure, then turns it into action: isolate the affected bank, schedule a borescope inspection, and flag the bearing for early replacement.

Sample week shown for illustration. Figures are from a product walkthrough, not an aggregated customer benchmark.

Boilers & Pressure Vessels Heat ExchangersPiping SystemsRotating EquipmentHigh-Pressure Industrial Assets
Meet the Agents

Three Agents. One Investigation.

Intake Agent

Upload a failure image and the related data. Image quality is checked automatically, the failure mechanism is read, and similar past RCA cases surface immediately, so no investigation starts from zero.

Analyzer Agent

Builds the full case: material details, photo analysis, failure mechanism, root cause, a prioritized inspection plan, and a complete corrective action roadmap. Everything autosaves, so nothing is lost mid-analysis.

Service Agent

Answers questions across your entire knowledge base in plain language, quality inspection guidance, SOP lookups, even past RCA case studies, without anyone having to search a document library.

See It Work

Watch a Live Case, Start to Finish

This is Case BR-220, a centrifugal pump bearing failure, exactly as the Analyzer Agent built it. Step through it yourself.

Analyzer Agent·Case BR-220
MaterialPhotoMechanismRoot CauseInspectionReport

Material Details

Component specification, bearing type, lubrication record, and service history pulled automatically from the uploaded failure data, no manual data entry.

Component

Centrifugal pump, drive-end bearing

Service History

In service 4.8 years, 1 prior inspection on record

Review & Governance

Every Case Gets a Second Set of Eyes

Field Service drafts the case. A person approves it. That order never reverses.

01

Case lands on the reviewer's dashboard

Every completed case appears with a clear pending count, nothing moves forward silently.

02

Read-only audit view

The reviewer steps through the same six stages the agent built, in a locked, auditable view, and approves or sends it back.

03

Approved cases build institutional memory

Once approved, the case is saved. The next time a similar failure comes in, Field Service pulls up that reviewed answer instantly, instead of starting over.

04

Feedback sharpens every future case

Reviewers can like or dislike a result directly, and that signal feeds back into how the next case gets analyzed.

Knowledge Base & Service Agent

Every Investigation, Checked Against Your Own Standards

The Knowledge Base holds your SMPs, SOPs, and protocols, the standards every case gets checked against. The Service Agent puts all of it behind one question box.

Service Agent · Ask anything across your knowledge base
What's our SOP for UT thickness surveys on waterwall tubes?
Pulling from your Standard Maintenance Practice for waterwall inspection. Minimum 12 measurement points per tube section, survey interval every 6 months for tubes with prior scale findings. Full protocol available below.

Quality inspection guidance, SOP lookups, and past RCA case studies, answered in plain language, no document search required.

Built for the Whole Team

Not Just Diagnostics. A System You Can Run.

Usage Tracking

See how the system is actually being used across teams and sites, not just case counts.

Member Management

Control who can submit, review, and approve, mapped to the roles your organization already has.

Feedback Loop

Reviewers like or dislike a result directly. That signal sharpens the next case, continuously.

Cost Visibility

Spend, budget health, and cost allocation down to which feature is actually driving usage.

Time to Value

From First Upload to First Approved Case

01

Connect & load

Knowledge base loaded with your SMPs, SOPs, and protocols.

02

First case run

Upload a real failure image and data; Inspec and Analyzer Agents build the case.

03

First review

Your reviewer approves or sends back inside the audit view.

04

Team rollout

Usage, members, and cost visibility scale to the full team.

Proof

What Manufacturers Get Out of It

0%

Fewer supplier-linked line stoppages (Tier-1 automotive OEM)

0%

Cut in inventory carrying cost via MRP decision intelligence

~0%

Reduction in repeat-failure investigation time, pending validation

~0x

Reserved for a Field Service-specific client outcome

FAQ

Questions Reliability Teams Ask First

No. It drafts the case, your team approves it. Every case requires human sign-off in the reviewer's audit view before it's considered final.

It's saved as reviewed knowledge. The next similar failure pulls that answer up instantly instead of starting the investigation from zero.

Yes. Your SMPs, SOPs, and protocols load into the Knowledge Base, and every case and Service Agent answer is checked against them, not a generic standard.

Boilers and pressure vessels, heat exchangers, piping systems, and rotating equipment, any high-pressure industrial asset with a failure history worth tracking.

Cost visibility is built in: spend, budget health, and allocation down to which feature is driving usage, reviewed alongside member management and usage tracking.

Ideally one reliability or maintenance lead and one reviewer who'd actually sign off on cases. 45 minutes.

Book a Demo

See Your Own Failure Data Run Through It

45 minutes, technical, agenda published below so there are no surprises. Bring a real (or recent) failure case if you have one.

The exact agenda
Your current RCA process today10 min
Live case walkthrough15 min
Review & governance model15 min
Rollout & next steps5min
AR
Arun Skaria
Technical Architect, Conforge
Book a Demo

No deck. No SDR. A specialist and your failure data.

Curious how it handles your equipment? 45 min, bring a real case if you've got one.Book a Demo