Conforge Logo

Customer Support Intelligence

Customer Support Quality Assurance Agent

Scores every voice, chat, and email interaction against your own rubric automatically, with evidence, compliance checks, and coaching recommendations attached, not just a small sample.

Watch a real interaction get scored end to end in under two minutes. No sign-up required to see it work.

Customer Support QA Agent·Evaluation Summary
89 / 100

Overall score

Pass

Compliance check

1 gap

Coaching flag

94%

AI confidence

Summary: Greeting, verification, and compliance language met standard in full. Resolution was reached, but the agent did not confirm the next steps back to the customer before ending the call. Coaching recommendation: reinforce the resolution confirmation habit.
Voice CallsLive ChatEmail ThreadsCRM & Ticketing SystemsContact Center Platforms
The Problem

Manual QA Cannot Keep Up With Interaction Volume

Support teams handle thousands of interactions a day. Most QA programs can only review a small sample by hand, which leaves the rest unmeasured.

No Consistent Standard

Interactions are not measured against the same quality bar across agents, teams, or channels.

Subjective Assessment

Agent performance is difficult to judge objectively when every reviewer scores a little differently.

Unidentified Skill Gaps

Coaching opportunities go unnoticed when only a fraction of interactions ever get reviewed.

Compliance Blind Spots

Required disclosures and process steps can be missed without anyone finding out.

No Trend Visibility

Customer experience patterns cannot be tracked systematically from a small manual sample.

No Data for Leadership

Leaders lack the evidence to support a quality improvement initiative with real numbers.

The Solution

Every Interaction Evaluated, Not Just a Sample

Voice, chat, and email interactions are ingested, standardized, and evaluated against your own rubric using generative AI.

Criterion-Wise Quality Scores

Each evaluation criterion scored on its own, not folded into one vague number.

Overall Quality Assessment

A single, standardized read of how the interaction went overall.

Evidence Behind Each Score

The exact quote or moment in the interaction that produced the score, not a black box.

Compliance Observations

Required disclosures and process steps checked automatically, every time.

Coaching Recommendations

A specific, actionable coaching note tied to what actually happened in the call.

Confidence Scores

Every AI-generated evaluation comes with a confidence level, so QA leads know what to double-check.

See It Work

Watch a Sample Interaction Get Scored

This is a sample call, not a real customer interaction. Step through it to see exactly what a QA lead would see.

Customer Support QA Agent·Interaction VC-3391
IntakeScoringAssessmentEvidenceComplianceCoaching

Interaction Intake

The interaction is ingested and transcribed automatically, no manual upload or tagging required.

Channel

Voice call, 8 min 42 sec

Agent

Support Agent J. Reyes

How It Works

From Raw Interaction to Coaching Note

01

Ingest

Voice, chat, and email interactions pulled in from your existing contact center and CRM platforms.

02

Standardize

Every interaction, regardless of channel, is converted into one common evaluation format.

03

Score Against Rubric

AI evaluates each interaction against your own quality criteria, not a generic scorecard.

04

Route for Review

Scores, evidence, and coaching notes land with the QA lead, ready to act on.

Deployment timeline figures withheld until backed by engagement-specific data. Publish the process, not invented numbers.

Proof From Adjacent Support Workflows

The Pattern Has Already Worked in Comparable Support Deployments

These are published results from related customer support AI deployments, ticket deflection and knowledge automation, not this specific QA scoring product. The relevance is the workflow pattern, not an identical use case.

0%+

Drop in L1 ticket volume when an AI agent solved issues directly

0%

Lower dealer call center load with an AI-powered chatbot

0%

Faster issue resolution speed with automated support

FAQ

Questions QA and Support Leaders Ask First

No. It replaces the manual sampling and scoring work, so QA analysts spend their time on coaching and process improvement instead of reviewing a small percentage of calls by hand.

Voice calls, chat transcripts, and email threads, all standardized into one evaluation format so scoring is consistent across channels.

Yes. The rubric is configured to your existing evaluation criteria, communication standards, and compliance requirements, not a generic scorecard.

Every score comes with the evidence it was built from, a direct quote or timestamp from the interaction, along with a confidence score, so a QA lead can verify it in seconds.

Every interaction can be evaluated, not just the small sample a manual QA process typically covers, giving full visibility instead of a limited snapshot.

Data is accessed through secure integrations with role-based access and a full audit trail, working with your existing contact center and CRM systems instead of replacing them.

Book a Demo

See It Score a Real Interaction

45 minutes, agenda published below so there are no surprises. Bring a real call or chat transcript if you can.

The exact agenda, steal it if you like
Your current QA process today10 min
Live evaluation walkthrough15 min
Rubric setup and compliance rules15 min
Rollout and next steps5 min
AS
Arun Skaria
Technical Architect
Book a Demo

No deck. No SDR. A specialist and a real interaction.

Curious how it scores your interactions? 45 min, bring a real call or chat if you have one.Book a Demo